Marc R. Shapiro.

伙伴

纽约


阅读完整的传记www.orrick.com.
Marc R. Shapiro是奥里克纽约办事处的合作伙伴。他是商业诉讼和最高法院和上诉练习团体的成员。

Marc代表了在审判和上诉水平的联邦和州法院的客户,特别关注课程诉讼,多区诉讼和群众加纳。最近,Marc在确保否定歧视诉讼中对违法行为对微软的诉讼歧视诉讼中的审查和确保的辩护和确认发挥了主导作用。在路易斯安那州的MDL法院涉及涉嫌缺陷的Drywall之前,他还成功地在课程行动中撤销了几个外国被告的解雇。Marc目前代表全国各地脑脑和伤害相关案件的NCAA,在全国范围内的气候变化诉讼,约翰逊和约翰逊在全国滑石有关的诉讼中,Sanei International Ltd.在国际合同和不公正的浓缩纠纷中,在合同和计算机欺诈和滥用行为争议的情况下,关于访问WHOIS注册人数据的服务条款,以及在29原告中的全球语言学家解决方案的争议和滥用行为争议,群众JOINDIND索赔法案案件。此外,为了回应Covid-19 Pandemery,Marc正在积极协助客户在解决健康危机中产生的诉讼。

Marc担任法律秘书,以判断美国法院的贝蒂B. Fletcher。在加入Orrick之前,Marc担任诉讼和判定律师的同等司法倡议。在这种情况下,他从事审判水平并上市代表国和联邦法院的客户,包括在美国最高法院之前介绍和争论的两份案件。

帖子:Marc Shapiro

个人使用公司计算机的监狱时间?最高法院授予证书,以决定是否与公司的使用条款不符合不合规构成违反计算机欺诈和滥用行为的行为

20世纪4月20日星期一,最高法院接受了证书van Burien v。美国to (hopefully) resolve a longstanding circuit split regarding the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (or CFAA): Does an individual exceed authorized access when he or she accesses a computer contrary to a policy or agreement limiting access (i.e., accessing a computer for a purpose beyond those permitted by the company).阅读更多

DéjàVu并不遍历:第九次电路在NOSE II中加强CFAA

电脑欺诈

2016年7月5日,第九次巡回赛上诉法院在最近一章发出了高度预期的决定美国v。NOSE,在计算机欺诈和滥用行为中使用的个人“无授权”(“CFAA”),当他/她自己的访问被撤销之后,个人利用另一个人来访问公司数据库的合法登录信息。这一决定对组织具有重要的影响,因为他们考虑如何实施关于用户访问的政策和技术控制,以确保他们在CFAA下的未经授权访问受到保护。

阅读更多

“不要去那里”:第二次电路使得对未经许可在未经许可的前雇员带来索赔

电脑欺诈

On December 3, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals became the most recent entrant into the circuit conflict on the question of when and under what circumstances an employee’s use of a computer to gain access to unauthorized information constitutes a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Over a dissent, the Court held that an employee cannot be convicted of violating the CFAA when he uses a database, to which he has been granted access, in a manner that is prohibited by company policy. With the Second Circuit joining the Fourth and Ninth Circuits in the minority on the issue, the answer continues to turn on the jurisdiction in which the suit was brought. Employers should take note because the decision reinforces the need to consider carefully whether and how to limit employee access to sensitive company information within its network—e.g., by use of written policy or technical access restrictions—and how those protections will play out in court if an employee takes company information for use in future employment.

阅读更多

站立你的理由:最高法院考虑在数据债务课程诉讼中审议常务问题

昨天,美国最高法院授予CertiorariSpokeo,Inc。v。罗宾斯,考虑对数据泄露课程行动的可行性至关重要的问题:站立。自法院最近的决定以来Clapper v。大赦国际美国,大多数较低的法院对未能满足III条伤害的伤害要求,驳回数据违约要求;然而,较低法院的越来越多的合唱团已经制定了这些行为。As the Supreme Court prepares to wrestle with that split of authority during oral argument this fall, it will be tasked with deciding whether a plaintiff’s allegations concerning violations of statutory rights under the Federal Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) are sufficient to establish standing irrespective of any tangible injury. The ramifications of that determination are deeply significant, as the decision may either open or close the floodgates to data breach litigation throughout the country.

阅读更多